Hi Joseph, Is it any slower than transferring a file of that size outside of the RB debugging process? My built app is about 20Mb in size (which is fine by me - it's pretty complex!) and I've not found that the "Transferring to..." stage of remote debugging takes any less time than copying a 20Mb file to that machine would anyway.
Dave. > From: Joseph Nastasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:18:52 -0500 > To: REALbasic NUG <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: RB2006r1 VERY VERY Slow > > > On Feb 20, 2006, at 12:01 PM, John Jobe wrote: > >> I'm using RB2005r4 and have no complaints about compile time. Sure >> faster is better, but it's not really any slower than what I'd expect. >> YMMV > > Me too, but one thing I do know is much slower is transferring the > compiled app to a remote machine when remote debugging. It really is > painfully slow. But, I'm sure it will get fixed as will the compile > issues with 2006R1. > -- > Joseph Nastasi > Pyramid Design - a software development firm > http://www.pyramiddesign.us > Voice 609 601-0814 Fax 609 601-0815 > Products: > A-OK! Spacecraft Simulation System - http://aok.pyramiddesign.us > A-OK! The Wings of Mercury http://www.aokwom.com > FTP Suite for REALbasic - http://ftpsuite.pyramiddesign.us > Columnist for REALbasic Developer Magazine > Proud Sponsors of REALbasic Olympics 2005 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
