Let me save you some time... There were initially some legitimate questions and criticisms about RB quality. That quickly spiraled into questions and criticisms about RS business practices. Some of those statements were interpreted as personal attacks - some were. Others leaped to defend and chastise the personal attacks. They were characterized as unsympathetic "bug-lovers" and from there I quit reading...
>From what I can tell there does seem to be some consensus that quality needs to be addressed. Unfortunately the devil is in the details and there are a lot of strong personalities advocating for one particular solution (that not surprising fixes their particular problem). ~joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Ford Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:10 PM To: REALbasic NUG Subject: Re: ** NUG List Etiquette and Resources (Unofficial) ** Oh, well. I guess I'll either have to quit the list or read everything; 192 still to go for today. Sigh. Terry _________ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
