On Thu, March 2, 2006 6:09 pm, Daniel L. Taylor wrote: > While it seems popular to blame RS for this, I have to say Apple deserves > the blame. They should have let development tool vendors know all along > that > a future transition to x86 was possible. They always knew this, they've > been > building and testing OS X (and Xcode) internally for x86 with every > release.
Just how much work is involved in making RB create Universal Binaries? When I first heard Apple's announcement and RS' response, my thought was that it wouldn't be difficult to do, but now with the delays it appears that it's more difficult than I thought. I'm wondering if part of the problem is that parts of RB are written in RB -- and since RB can't create a UB now, does that make it more difficult to add that feature? Are other environments (other than XCode) already producing UBs or is RS having to wait or workaround Codewarrior or other development evironment's limitations? Just curious what's involved at a technical level. -- Marc Zeedar Publisher REALbasic Developer Magazine http://www.rbdeveloper.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
