On 3/4/06, Andy Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No because I'm targetting a Windows box so I can use Windows Remote > Desktop (which has a fine Mac free client as well).
I tried the Windows Remote Desktop, the Mac client is fine. The Windows Client is fine. It's pretty useless for remote support, when you want to see what's happening on the clients session, when you log into a Windows XP pro machine it logs out the local user. When you log into a windows 2000 server, it opens up a new session. If I'm on my mac and want to check out my Win XP machine, I use Windows Remote Desktop. (I don't mind logging me out on the windows machine, I've only got one monitor anyway ... ) > I would use VNC if I had to go to Mac but if it was regular and > professional I'd check out the Apple Remote Desktop and Timbuktu > (which announced some interesting Skype tie-ins this week). OSXvnc is faster than the Apple built in VNC server, I'll checkout the Apple Remote Desktop, thanks. I'd had issues with Timbuktu going from an internal machine to another internal machine. UltraVNC for PC to PC connections is just as good as Timbuktu. Thanks for your thoughts. -- Keith Hutchison http://balance-infosystems.com http://realopen.org _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
