OK, I get it now. It's OK to make blatant, ignorant claims about
someone else's product, but if that someone calls you on it, then
it's a "personal attack". And it's also OK to lie about
misrepresentations you made. In the Camtasia video, you said "Again,
unreadable". There you were displaying a 1280x1024 screen in a fairly
small window. Of course it is scaled down to fit. That is a *feature*
of BSS. It's also the source of the "slowness" you perceive. If you
had bothered to read the manual or the performance tips, you'd know
that, and could, at the very least in making a "fair" comparison,
identify it. It was dishonest not to, as I go to great lengths to
help people achieve good performance and even understand the source
of performance issues. It's not your slow computer. It's the size of
the your screen you want to share, and I bet if you were on a slower
network than your LAN (say an upstream limited DSL line between you
and a customer), you'd find BSS to be *faster* since it isn't pumping
as much data per frame over the network, as it scales down the image
on the sender side to fit the window needed on the receiver side.
But hey, again, OK to misrepresent another's product, not OK to call
someone on it when they do. I now understand open source ethics.
Thanks for the lesson, Keith. You're a great teacher.
-Brad
On Mar 4, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Keith Hutchison wrote:
I asked you to stop attacking me personally. Who has the comprehension
impairment?
Maybe you could stop attacking the messenger and instead look at
the speed
issues of BSS ...
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
