On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:24 PM, John Balestrieri wrote:
Less confusing (and more accurate?) might be Rb06, Rb07, etc.
Yes, but this naming scheme is not Y3K compliant. Or year 2100, for that matter. ;)
-- Brad Rhine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bradrhine.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
