Hmmm
2.3G Dual Core G5 : .94s
1.0G DP G4 : 1.94s
1.8G Single PM G5 : 1.55s
1.25 PB G4 12" : 1.39s <- Strange result
Jay Wooten, President
Visual Dynamics, Inc. - Authorized Apple Specialist
www.visdyninc.com
321-773-7788 w
321-773-9604 f
----------------
Everything is easier on a Mac!
----------------
Mac OS 10.4.5
On Apr 14, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Giulio wrote:
I now, comparisons between Mac and PC are old refrains,but I would
like to share this home-made simple stupid benchmark with you:
I know, it is not a scientific benchmark, but all in all it
involves populating a listbox with data, and is true that's what we
do must of the time with REAL Basic in REAL world applications,
isn't it?
today I wrote and compiled the following little lines of code
-------------------------------
dim ind as integer
dim ris as double
ris = Microseconds
for ind = 1 to val(100000)
lista.addrow str(microseconds)
next
result.text = str((Microseconds - ris)/1000000)
-------------------------------
a quite cheap Pentium 4 - 3 GHz - 768 MB RAM: 5.25 seconds !
G5 double 2 GHz, 2,5 MB RAM: 12.2 seconds !!
MacBook Pro, Dual core 2 GHz, 2 GB RAM: 27.2 seconds !!!
( OK, I know, Rosetta... )
MacBook Pro, Dual core 2 GHz, 2 GB RAM, Windows XP installed on a
virtual machine with Parallels Workstatio Beta: 2.1
seconds !!!!!!!!!!!!
So I'm here asking, please please please someone explain me why
some things, like handling listboxes, are so sadly, incredibly,
unacceptably slower on Mac Os compared with Windows?
thank you,
Giulio
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
