I promised I wouldn't, but here I am, at it again.
Think harder and think about Design by Contract and subverting meaning
:-)
RB wasn't designed by contract. I'm not sure what you mean with 'subverting
meaning'.
At the very least, if RS gave into pressure and implemented this
... the pressure of needing to make a better product? Yeah that can be a
bitch.
feature I would demand that they do it with
1) an optional flag
2) that the option default to OFF for object-passing support so nobody
can be surprised by it being suddenly available.
Sounds good, and how about my suggestion for Variants? Mars, you have my
express permission to take that and treat it as if you thought of it
yourself, if that would hurry its implementation.
Ronald Vogelaar
--
http://www.rovosoft.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
