Faster or better may be at odd ends here. If you need a UTF-8 compliant regex engine, you need PCRE – which is what RB uses. But if you need fast matching you can probably use some of the other engines lying around – the one used in gawk for instance, wrapped in a dylib or a plugin, but it'll probably be at the cost of Unicode – haven't played with these libs in a while, dunno what their status is re: utf.
But from your original question you seem to need UTF, so PCRE it is. -- dda libcurl4RB, [S]FTP transfers made easy http://sungnyemun.org/?q=node/8 On 6/8/06, Sven E Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I should first take a look exactly what i need, I don't remember if the 'found string' have the feature with string.length in RB RegEx ... i should check it out, but as i could see there must be a need for the RB developer with a better RegEx... (as Mark Nutter wrote there is some feature request) REGards, Sven E
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
