Rb needs to compile "plugins" that are the compiled version of modules,
classes, windows, etc, so that they are less likely to be "hacked".
Is there a feedback id that anyone knows for this?
- Ryan Dary
Stefan P. wrote:
Ok, Thx!
Then, there is basically no notion to protect your code
against non-registered use. Even passing an internal magic number
between internal method calls, is probably no solution.
BTW: I wouldn't say, that they hide the code as good as possible:
Symmetrically crypting the code using a user supplied secret
would be a bit more secure. Well, a developer could pass the
secret to someone else, but..
Am 10.06.2006 um 14:59 schrieb Christian Schmitz:
Stefan P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Developers can't read the source of encrypted modules
using the RB IDE
If you have the correct RB Release you can read it because of a bug.
- RB can read the source of encrypted modules
it can.
- The current release of RB discloses all available functions/sub
including their signatures [even private methods]
They hide the source as good as possible.
- Developers 'theoretically' could read the source of encrypted
modules,
if they would be able to read the VM image of RB, while compiling
an encrypted module
I bet they can.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
