> >> I don't think SQLite received any additional attention - the core > >> technology > >> there is free. But a free database that was designed for non-network > >> deployment doesn't make it suddenly more attractive as a server > >> product. > > > > It does at least on the web development side (eg php which now > > includes a sqlite module). > > I dont think that makes any difference. SQLite has a great virtue and that > is its incredibly "open" - its public domain. I dont think its inclusion > with PHP gives it any particular validation except on the basis of its > license. > > Apple is also using it, but, based on the feedback I got from the person > who actually made that decision at Apple, it was not on any basis of > technical merit at all - but only because that its public domain, so they > could avoid any licensing issues. > > Out of the box its a competent database engine, but equally so, it was not > intended on being a networked server. You have to do a lot of extra work > to make something like that happen. > > Best regards, > > Lynn Fredricks > President > Paradigma Software, Inc > Valentina Office Server Universal Binary Version - watch for it. >
Is this to imply that Valentina does offer a server version of its database (assuming a non-universal is available now)? If so how much are the licensing fees, what are the terms, what are the advantages and what is the compatibility with SQL? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
