The number of remaining hairs on my head is asymptotically approaching zero. I will soon have to start work on my beard.

What is it with RBScript and why does RS look the other way and pretend it doesn't exist? RBScript has been seriously flawed since before RB5.5.5, with nasty bugs that all but preclude using it seriously:

<http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=sbuwicsb>
<http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=yptloqht>
<http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=zxlgehay>

and probably others that haven't bitten me personally yet. The first one is a jaw-dropper (in that it's still present in RB2006r3).

However, with some user education, and some really bizarre code I can work around those.

Now I find one that wasn't present in RB5.5.5, and which has has stopped the port from RB5.5.5 to RB2006r3 (once again):

<http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=vielzvnp>

RS doesn't even seem to want to admit these bugs exist, and the number of watchers is so low they can find other (presumably easier) stuff to fix anyway. However, once again, I'm stuck with RB5.5.5 for the foreseeable future.

So, _if_ you use RBScript in your applications, I urge you to add one or more of the above to your watch list. I can't believe the number of RBScript users is so low.

RS: if any/all of these fall into the QuickFix category, I might be tempted to empty my wallet...

Paul Rodman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to