I think it means that any application written/compiled using 6r4 can
be compiled as a UB. Why would you think the complexity of the app
would prevent that?
As far as I am aware RS is still not using the currently shipping
version of Rb to create the next version of Rb, so they don't have
the option of 'checking a box and clicking 'Build''. *That* would
explain why Rb (the IDE) doesn't fall into the category of 'most
REALbasic applications'. I would think yours would though.
On Aug 13, 2006, at 22:31, Andy Dent wrote:
I notice that the press release does NOT say the IDE will be a UB
itself.
Does that mean the IDE falls into the category of NOT "most
REALbasic applications" or was the release just poorly worded?
This is a fairly critical issue to me as I have a client waiting
eagerly for UB for a publishing app with a complex UI to rival RB
itself (at least the form editor). If RB can't be compiled to UB
using r4 then it sounds like we won't be able to either.
--
David Glass - Gray Matter Computing
graymattercomputing.com - corepos.com
559-303-4915
Apple Certified Help Desk Specialist
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
