On Sep 8, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Terry Ford wrote:
I'm also one of those users that is very interested in any way to
improve the "Official" documentation in an "In House" manner. As
much as RS has been improving its OLR, there is still a lot to be
desired. The new format lends itself well to rapid and continuing
changes as opposed to the old format.
How's that? RS still has to update their master documentation and
then stick it in HTML to ship with the next version. The only
difference is it's in HTML rather than a custom binary format with
a (horrible) custom viewer.
The first versions were. The latest has changed things around to
some confusion and introduced new syntax errors. The old (and PDF)
way was confusing enough. Now it's ridiculous.
Here's a comparison of the Canvas.AcceptTags Property in the OLR
version for 2006r2, PDF version for r3 and OLR version for r3 is as
follows........
There's some kind of misunderstanding here. I don't understand how
this fits to what you originally said. You said "The new format lends
itself well to rapid and continuing changes as opposed to the old
format." I interpreted that as you saying that because the OLR is in
HTML it's easier for RS to create new and modify the existing pages
and redistribute it.
--
Seth Willits
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
