On 10/8/06, Narinder Chandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. I appreciate that 4D processes are not the same as RB threads. Up until now I was not creating my own RB threads. The reason for trying this way was that I (incorrectly as it turns out) assumed that as my whole application was running in the main RB thread then I perhaps I could solve my multiple transaction problem with multiple threads. Of course this was silly because I had only a single globally accessible database connection open through which all DB access takes place regardless of window/thread!
There are several aspects I do not understand - AFAIK, you should still display UI only in main application thread. RB uses native threads - does it means that I should not use UI in different thread? Or maybe I do not understand it correctly and above means only that all UI events are dispatched to main thread only, which would make UI in other than main thread difficult. -- Peter Bozek _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
