On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Sven E Olsson wrote:
On 2006-10-11, at 7:19 PM, Joe Huber wrote:
In answer to a question over on the Forum I put together this list
of all the actual release dates since the Rapid Release model was
instituted.
It's noteworthy that RS has never missed an update date and they
have often provided updates MUCH more frequently when it was
needed. Everyone with a subscription has been getting their
money's worth, at least in terms of number of updates.
Rapid release plan announced 5/20/2005
2005r1 6/14/2005
2005r2 8/2/2005
2005r3 9/13/2005
2005r4 10/12/2005
2006r1 1/11/2006
2006r2 4/13/2006
2006r3 7/6/2006
2006r4 10/4/2006
Regards,
Joe Huber
Yes it looks just fine, but perhaps this time a "bug release is
needed" ...
Every release is a bug fix (when possible) IMHO.
And just an another thing, this list is an "worldwide list",
please use the ISO 8601 Standard Date format, It is very difficult
to guess what date is really is.
(In this case my guess works, because month 20 is both NIL and do
not exists)
I guess, because I live in Canada, I am familiar with both short date
formats. I use common sense like you as well.
Why don't we all use YYYY/MM/DD/hh:mm:ss and 24 hour format? It's not
even consistent in Canada. And the US refuses to go metric as well
even though they were a proponent at one time. :)
Terry
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
