On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
But if the schedule becomes the sole metric, then it drives you to
cut out
the more intensive issues/features or let them slide from one
version to the
next because the cycle is just too short.
Actions speak louder than any words.
The most recent 2006r4 release just barely made it out under the pre-
announced release schedule.
Judge for yourself what's more important.
I'm still a proponent of REAL using their criteria to select a number
of bugs/enhancements to focus on, fix/implement them, make them rock
solid and see there are no weird side effects and release that.
Many people still use 5.x as they consider that the last "rock solid"
release and they have issues trying to move those old projects to new
versions.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
