Sweet!
thanks for the reply.
-Briman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trausti Thor Johannsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "REALbasic NUG" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: .sitx against .sit
Yes, no probblem.
Trausti
On Nov 18, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Briman wrote:
If im creatin on a Windows machine and zip my executible with say
winzip...
will a Mac OSX be able to unzip it??
Ive never used a Mac so be gentle
-Briman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "REALbasic NUG" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: .sitx against .sit
Am 18.11.2006 um 00:39 schrieb Carlo Rubini:
Uploading Mac-intended software in Stuffit format, will the end
user get any problem expanding a .sitx file instead of a more
common .sit file?
Yes, .sit is more compatible.
Moreover, I'd drop .sit/.sitx all over. Today, .zip is the
standard format for OS X,
since Apple no longer ships StuffIt as part of OS X.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
