On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Lars Jensen wrote:
How about
dim items() as variant
.... fill the array somehow ....
for each item in items()
...
next
What type should "item" be ?
Variant -- if the type is unspecified, the compiler matches the
thing to be iterated, that's all.
Far enough.
I just like to explicitly state things instead of having to recall
special rules so there's no possibility that my intent can be
incorrectly interpreted.
You know the drill. Make the feature request if it's important to you
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
