Do I take it from this that RB developers would benefit from the addition of such constructs to the RB language ?
On 20/2/07 16:29, "Guyren Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (first class functions, > continuations, closures, modifying classes at runtime, > metaclasses, ...). If you're comfortable with programming using those > abstractions, you can write programs that are more concise and > flexible than you can using REALbasic. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________________ www.13flatFIVE.com The C++ <> REALbasic code migration specialists _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
