On Mar 23, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Ryan Dary wrote: > [all kinds of nasty ickiness removed :)]
returning 1,d or a dictionary that has 1 item seems ... well ... silly You can already tell how many items are IN the dictionary by IT's count so it would be unnecessary > I mean, that is one of the reasons to return a class object, > because you > can essentially return multiple values in a nice object. > > My vote is that this is basically unnecessary and would just be a new > area for problems to arise. Agreed Make a class and return that I don't beliebe this is a problem that needs a solution in the language as we can already make our own means to return multiple items in any one of several ways - just as in many other languages Even a language like Applescript simple returns a single tuple and you still have to get at items with either a name (ie/ a class member) or an index (item 1 of ...) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
