This whole time I am reading this, I am thinking, this is such a good opening for third parties.
I mean, what RS has given us is more then usable for most little things, but honestly no matter how much they give us, we are still going to have different needs, specially when it comes to what everyones needs are. I like the third party solutions out there, if you need more then whats given, 1) We can make our own, or 2) Support a third party solution. Isnt that what our industry is about? IMHO Norman Palardy wrote: > On Apr 03, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote: > > >> There is one area where Theo's assertion does hold some ground. >> Anybody who deals with supporting RBScript in their application >> will understand the need for an editor that specifically supports >> editing of RB code. It would be so much nicer to have end >> customers enjoy the benefits that we as developers have when they >> write scripts. The RB IDE script editor demonstrates that they >> have the ability to do this, but have chosen to not to do so. An >> EditField specifically designed to handle RBScripts would really >> be a great thing to have. >> > > A feature request to see if REAL would package up their editor in a > fashion we could use it would be in order then. > > It's not a general purpose "code" editor though. Maybe it can be > extended to be one (I have no idea) > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
