Theodore H. Smith wrote: > > > I use double-linked lists for file caching. Then I moved it over to > using my RingTree class. It's slightly wasteful here, because for > each object, 8 bytes are wasted on unneeded parent and child > properties. But it's OK really. 8 bytes per object isn't much when > you have around 200 objects max. > You could get aound this 'issue' by using a XOR linked list instead of a double linked list.
Saves on RAM, but my guess is that it would be slightly slower. Ronald Vogelaar http://www.rovosoft.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
