Yes, that's what I was specifically thinking of since it occurs so often. On the other hand, if there were other ways language wise of accessing ones parent objects without needing a property for it - via scoping rules etc, that would be even better.
On 11/4/07 14:30, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, now that I think about it, maybe using WeakRef in a clean > parent/child hierarchy isn't so bad after all. Just be sure the > semantics are clear -- the parent owns the children, and the children > have only a weakref to the parent. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
