From: "Craig Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Live Encode VS Pre Encode
Alex:
I thought I would chime in on this one, and let you know that Randy is
correct in his statement. You have more flexibility to do pre-processing to
the audio data if you don't live encode it. Live encoding doesn't offer you
the chance to EQ, filter, or normalize. These processes can definitely
produce better quality encodes.
Regards,
Craig Fisher
encoding.com
(p)206.521.4901
(f)206.521.4927
(m)206.499.0606
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of RealForum
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Live Encode VS Pre Encode
From: "Randall Rocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Live Encode VS Pre Encode
I can't imagine that live encoding can match the quality of pre-encoded
material. After digitizing at a high sample rate such as 44.1, you can take
the resultant file and process it, removing noise, applying normalization,
filtering, equalizing, etc. Encoding this "processed" file can give
excellent results.
Yours, Randy
*******************************************************
The RealForum is an email discussion group focused on using RealNetworks
products. The RealForum is a place to post messages about the best methods
for creating content using RealNetworks technologies and the planning and
implementation of streaming-media web sites. Archives of RealForum can
be found at http://realforum.real.com
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following
command in the body of your email message:
unsubscribe realforum
or from another account, besides the address you subscribed with:
unsubscribe realforum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
