Volker Nitsch wrote: > - Ladislav is a guru here. > If he says "we" we agree. Or he does not say it. :) > > - He is right again. Mostly. Debatable. Depends if guru Gabriele steps > in. Or guru /me, sometimes. Or you. ;)
Guru-smooroo ... look that one up Mr. Nitsch and add that to "your dictionary" >> Guru-smooroo: "pshaw" == "pshaw" Volker Nitsch wrote: > - Your 'aliases has a subtle bug. Try > ctx: context [w1: none] > probe aliases? 'w1 in ctx 'w1 Your example fails. This isn't a bug. A labelling word within an object isn't a first class word, at least not in the 'global context'. It's an "invisible word" until we peek into the internals of ctx to see it. Isn't it not the case the "REBOL doesn't look into a block until you tell it to do so". Only the 'ctx' in your example is a word to a definitional. 'ctx/w1 is a path to an aspect of an object. >> type? 'ctx/w1 == path! >> ; see, a path, not a word! But I suppose, one could add 'test case' to see in what context are we when we ask aliases? As an aside, wikipedia? You might as well read the graffiti bathroom walls at the train station. At least in the train station, the writing comes closer to existence. There's far too many persuasion-in-propaganda works already. The world does not need another false source of bogus humanist/atheist/pragmatist/liberal/socialist clap-trap. ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
