On Friday, 23-March-2007 at 13:27:25 Brian Wisti wrote, >I will continue to use REBOL for exactly as long as I find it to be >useful in general purpose light weight tasks. I am impatient for it to >be more than a pocket knife with a corkscrew, though ;-) > >I think that my only problem with your post is based on differing >definitions of success for a business. Mine is based simply on profit >and maintaining whatever values the company has defined for itself. >Yours appears to be based on widespread recognition and assimilation >into normal corporate affairs. Your statements are probably accurate >for that definition of success at this point in corporate history.
But what is RT's definition of success? If it's based on 'widespread recognition and assimilation into normal corporate affairs', then they've not been too successful there. And the evidence for success by your definition is where? I suspect it's neither of those though, and more along the lines of 'changing the way computers are used, and for the better'. Revolutionaries seldom hand over the reins to others, and certainly not to those who they wish to replace. Their ideas are their precious till they day they die... -- Carl Read. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
