On Saturday 21 April 2007 17:25, bryan rasmussen wrote: > Hi, > > There was a big blog brouhaha recently as to if Ruby was an acceptable > LISP, and then steve yegge argued that lisp was not an acceptable lisp > http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html > , Rebol has always struck me as sort of lisp-y so anyone have any > arguments for Rebol as an acceptable lisp or opinions on where it > fails? :-) Better to ask the Common Lisp community if rebol is an acceptable lisp. Given the diatribes I've seen written about NewLisp by CL folks, I don't expect the CL people would consider rebol acceptable.
But then, should we care? tim -- Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Palmer, Alaska, USA -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
