How about "pick-next" or "pick-last"?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Johnson Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Re: Redefining system words - gotchas On Friday 27 April 2007 06:27, Anton Rolls wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Do you need 'sys-pick to point to the original ? > How about this: > > if action? :pick [pick: ...] > > Keep in mind the whole world of rebol code is expecting > PICK to be the built-in one. Of course! > Why not just define 'my-pick or 'tj-pick and leave poor 'pick alone ? ugh! not good choices... for my taste anyway. My question is kind of academic, for a global word, I would "pick" a=20 different one. My choice turned out to be=20 "peek". for the sake of anyone reading the thread however, I must include that there is much code written where system words have redefined. Where I think it is most safe to do so is inside of a context. thanks tim --=20 Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Palmer, Alaska, USA --=20 To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to=20 lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
