Brian:
> No clue if those are good bad or indifferent.

Thanks for doing that. Here's a clue: they look very good compared 
to the host that runs REBOL.org.  Here's my latest for 
that....Each of the numbers are the *best* result picked from a 
dozen runs. The worst/average are often lower.

Console: 0:00:00.119881 - 4207 KC/S
Processor: 0:00:00.697961 - 1237 RHz (REBOL-Hertz)
Memory: 0:00:02.318384 - 20 MB/S
Disk/File: 0:00:05.510997 - 5 MB/S

About the only thing that can't get much slower is the Disk/File 
number [it'll drop to a sluggish 4MB/S, but I've never seen lower].

***

Somewhere on the DevCon2007 videos is Carl and I agreeing that 
REBOL.org needs to migrate to a host that has a computer built in 
the current century. But neither of us are likely to make a move 
on that for a while. It's a priority, but not a high enough one. 
Still, it'll be good to know the fastest REBOL host around when we 
do, so I'd appreciate seeing other people's benchmarks.

Sunanda.
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to