Kai,
Tim is correct, you have to be more careful
handling errors. Example, this is not enough
to trap the error:
my-error: try [1 / 0] disarm my-error
In the first expression above, the set-word
looks for a value, and gets an error from TRY.
The result returned is the value of the set-word,
which is the error, so it is left to "explode".
You can do this:
disarm my-error: try [...]
but that assumes that there always will be an error.
It will fail when your code does not make an error:
disarm my-error: try [print 100]
So a way that handles all errors and normal return values
is:
if error? set/any 'my-error try [...][
print mold disarm my-error
]
Yes, it is quite wordy, but it's possible to refactor
into helper functions, as Ladislav has done.
Regards,
Anton.
> Tim ~ There is a disarm (right below the probe... line)
>
> If I only knew how to tame my mailer...!!
>
> Kai
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
