All in all very good. Carl Read wrote: > On Monday, 19-Novenber-2007 at 12:07:52 Petr Krenzelok wrote, > > >> But I will not help situation if I just complain, without proposing what >> should be done. So - suggest - what should be done? :-) >> > > 1) If RT's a business then it needs to act like one. Which, for starters, > means answering every email they receive, ideally within 24 hours. > When Bo was there, we got an immediate reply > 1a) If RT doesn't like the hassle of email, they should have an interface on > their website that replaces email for this job. > > 2) They need to spell out on their website every little detail about the > products they have for sale - not only what they do, but also what they don't > do. (So RT doesn't get bothered with too many emails asking silly questions > about them.) > > 3) IF RT promises to add feature X then they should deliver on that promise - > not quitely forget about it and promise feature Y a little while later. > When I bought /command I expected, that the bugs I reported should be fixed in not less than half a year. But I learned, that either their business plan did not work as expected or was altered, probably both.( > 4) R3 should not be released until it's performing very well on Windows, OS X > and Linux and within their respective web-browsers - and any other OSs they > plan to support real soon. (And by R3 I mean its version of Core and View.) > > 5) If RT's a business then it needs to act like one. Oh, already said that! > It needs rubbing home though. If REBOL's not going to be open-source, then > for REBOL to succeed RT will have to be business-like. So for 6 I propose... > > 6) All RT products should be sold from an eBay store. RT should find the > feedback score they receive very enlightening... > > -- Carl Read. > >
-- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
