Hi Nick It seems to be some problem with the encoding. Somewhere "3D" has been inserted between "?article=" and "j98t".
It displays properly when viewed at mail.rebol.net (message number 46371) but is incorrect in your reply (46372). You'll also notice your reply has =20 inserted at the end of each wrapped line. Regards Peter Your email client On Monday, December 24, 2007, at 03:09 pm, Nick Antonaccio wrote: > > Peter, > > Hehe, the link still seems to be messed up :) > > > To anyone who may be interested in the idea of Rebol promotion: > > I came across a group called "Euses", which could potentially be =20 > helpful in extending Rebol's exposure: > > http://eusesconsortium.org/ > > They seem to have some significant reach, especially in the academic > =20 > community, and the Rebol design principles maybe could be interesting > =20 > to them. Their acronym stands for "end users shaping effective =20 > software". They're a consortium representing several universities, =20 > who's goal is to "empower end users to be able to write their own =20 > programs". They state that the number of end-user programmers in the > =20 > United States is more than 20 times that of professional programmers > =20 > (55 million end user programmers, compared to 2.75 million =20 > professionals). They strike me as a good group for Rebol to get =20 > involved with... > > > Quoting Peter Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> Hi Nick >> >> I messed up the link when I copied it: >> >> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display- >> article.r?article=3Dj98t >> >> >> On Sunday, December 23, 2007, at 11:49 pm, Nick Antonaccio wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter, >> >> I messed up the link when I copied it: >> >> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display- >> article.r?article=3Dj98t >> >>> Somehow, I'd never really paid much attention to those >>> "documentation" >>> links on each Rebol.org script (I think I'd maybe checked a few, >>> years >>> ago, and never found any content). >> >> Quite recently, Brian Tiffin spent a lot of his time documenting many >> "un-owned" scripts. >> >>> It strikes me that since Rebol.org is likely one of the first places >>> that newcomers go to read through code, that's a great solution, and >>> one that new users should be made more aware of on the main >>> documentation page at rebol.com. Maybe a "documentation" link right >>> in the search results at rebol.org would make such materials more >>> immediately apparent to newcomers. >> >> I'll see if I can help Sunanda come up with something. I know he's >> very >> busy at the moment. >> >>> Also, you are correct - "square brackets" is more definitive. >> >> That's just because I'm English and I really didn't know that >> Americans >> refer to brackets as parentheses in everyday language. In everyday >> English () are brackets, they are only parentheses in mathematical and >> scientific use. >> >> Regards >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to >> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
