On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 15:24 +0800, Peter Wood wrote: > Hi Nick > > It seems to be some problem with the encoding. Somewhere "3D" has been > inserted between "?article=" > and "j98t".
IIRC, putting an URL in these angled brackets prevents a mailer from line-wrapping it, which should also prevent =3D from being inserted: <http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display-article.r?article=kg55x#section-3> <http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display-article.r?article=j98t> > > It displays properly when viewed at mail.rebol.net (message number > 46371) but is incorrect in your reply (46372). You'll also notice your > reply has =20 inserted at the end of each wrapped line. > > Regards > > Peter > > Your email client > > On Monday, December 24, 2007, at 03:09 pm, Nick Antonaccio wrote: > > > > > Peter, > > > > Hehe, the link still seems to be messed up :) > > > > > > To anyone who may be interested in the idea of Rebol promotion: > > > > I came across a group called "Euses", which could potentially be =20 > > helpful in extending Rebol's exposure: > > > > http://eusesconsortium.org/ > > > > They seem to have some significant reach, especially in the academic > > =20 > > community, and the Rebol design principles maybe could be interesting > > =20 > > to them. Their acronym stands for "end users shaping effective =20 > > software". They're a consortium representing several universities, =20 > > who's goal is to "empower end users to be able to write their own =20 > > programs". They state that the number of end-user programmers in the > > =20 > > United States is more than 20 times that of professional programmers > > =20 > > (55 million end user programmers, compared to 2.75 million =20 > > professionals). They strike me as a good group for Rebol to get =20 > > involved with... > > > > > > Quoting Peter Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> > >> Hi Nick > >> > >> I messed up the link when I copied it: > >> > >> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display- > >> article.r?article=3Dj98t > >> > >> > >> On Sunday, December 23, 2007, at 11:49 pm, Nick Antonaccio wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Peter, > >> > >> I messed up the link when I copied it: > >> > >> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/art-display- > >> article.r?article=3Dj98t > >> > >>> Somehow, I'd never really paid much attention to those > >>> "documentation" > >>> links on each Rebol.org script (I think I'd maybe checked a few, > >>> years > >>> ago, and never found any content). > >> > >> Quite recently, Brian Tiffin spent a lot of his time documenting many > >> "un-owned" scripts. > >> > >>> It strikes me that since Rebol.org is likely one of the first places > >>> that newcomers go to read through code, that's a great solution, and > >>> one that new users should be made more aware of on the main > >>> documentation page at rebol.com. Maybe a "documentation" link right > >>> in the search results at rebol.org would make such materials more > >>> immediately apparent to newcomers. > >> > >> I'll see if I can help Sunanda come up with something. I know he's > >> very > >> busy at the moment. > >> > >>> Also, you are correct - "square brackets" is more definitive. > >> > >> That's just because I'm English and I really didn't know that > >> Americans > >> refer to brackets as parentheses in everyday language. In everyday > >> English () are brackets, they are only parentheses in mathematical and > >> scientific use. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Peter > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > >> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
