Henrik sorry I did not reply earlier.

I have read through your post twice, some things I get and others I don't=
.

But what you suggest could be way better than what I had in mind.

I cannot really judge, if you read my post to Max, I try to explain that =
it is not just a matter of making it easier, but a matter of extending RE=
BOL solutions to different classes of computer users.

The illustration you use (R3):

  >> words-of my-object
  =3D=3D [self name address street age]

Is a great example of something very different to what I had in mind, tha=
t really helps.

Your CVS example as well as being a more function orientated approach is =
close to what I had in mind, and of course you are right it is all about =
getting the right level of generalization.

If the thing is thought about in terms of engaging a different level of c=
omputer user, without confining them to a dumbed-down version, but as a l=
egitmate doorway in REBOL that to me seems to be a real problem that is n=
eed of a solution.

I will not clutter up this elist with more general stupidities than I can=
 help, I would like to encourage people to think along the lines of REBOL=
-simple as a legitimate goal. I am sure if a real solution is made it wil=
l not resemble anything much I have in mind (which is a good thing).

When you say:
"By using mezzanines to simply the language in general you can increase r=
eadability and reduce visible complexity. We just have to find sufficient=
ly generic cases to solve and carefully pick which ones to implement."

I feel you are spot on. Most of it is about removing visible complexity, =
and should not be a part of R3 itself. If the right generic mix is produc=
ed then that is a very simple way for novices to get started doing non-tr=
ivial scripting in a simple way (not necessarily a code efficient way -- =
but computers are faster these days, perceived speed is not often effecte=
d).

Bundle this up in a sensible and comprehensible way and you have the ever=
ybody's interface to REBOL and no barrier to using REBOL proper.

Thank you Henrik.

Greg Schofield Perth Australia


--- Message Received ---
From: Henrik Mikael Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:01:11 +0200
Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL-SIMPLE dialect
-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to