On Thursday, 21-August-2008 at 7:18:46 Tim Johnson wrote,
 
>> Well spotted.  Plus, given this was supposed to be an easy example for new
>> users to figure out, isn't it reasonable to assume that the questionmark is
>> part of REBOL's syntax and not just a character that's part of a word? 
>> Afterall, colons are added to both the beginning and ends of words in
>> REBOL, so it stands to reason that a questionmark on the end of one
>> suggests they can be added to all words. ie...
> Hiya Carl:
> Might be good to check all type predicates for R3. Myself I've made use of 
>only
> a few of the datatypes - but with REBOL3 coming along would be a good
> time to review them. Know that all tests are correct would "harden" rebol.

I've not touched R3 yet.  Will wait until I've actually a need for it, since 
I've no time just to play with it.  (Plus I loath software upgrades.  Seems 
there's one or two a week these days if you've a reasonable amount of software 
installed, and with them all having the potential to waste hours of your time 
should they stuff something up...)

> BTW: I noticed something interesting:
> >>  source email?
>email?: native ["Returns TRUE for email values." value [any-type!] 43]
>
>Us "old hands" know that 'native means that this function is coded in C 
>and compiled into the binary _But_ what does the number 43 mean?
>again email?: native ["Returns TRUE for email values." value [any-type!] 43]

Seems all the datatypes have a number...

>> source file?
file?: native ["Returns TRUE for file values." value [any-type!] 42]

so probably something as simple their addition to REBOL.

Is there to be a video datatype in R3?  I see there's a video tag planned for 
HTML 5.  Hopefully REBOL plans to keep up.

-- Carl Read.

-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to