Hi Petr,
maybe you should look at the market share of IIS and where its heading. the
/Apache thing was being developed just a short time before I learned of
REBOL but I have seen many a post about it. I think that if you look at the
propositions about all the other products its clear that /Apache is on the
backburner and to me I would be surprised if its still in work at all. I
really don't think its necessary given the resources and outlook of RT.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Paul Tretter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Krenzelok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Rebol/Apache?
> Hi,
>
> if you will look at RT's product website, you will notice there is no
> mention of Link/World, and they are mentioning Rebol/View and
> Rebol/View/Pro there instead.
>
> However, I would like to enter Apache territory once again. So the
> question for Jeff and Dan:
>
> Jeff - would it be too much of work to rebuild Rebol/Apache, based upon
> Rebol/Core 2.5?
>
> Dan - would you consider /Apache release based upon Core/Pro?
>
> The question is, if addition of shell and library interfaces to Apache
> wouldn't be considered as a break of security. Then maybe both
> components could be allowed at least during the boot-load time ....
>
> Thanks,
> -pekr-
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
