Paul Tretter wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> maybe you should look at the market share of IIS and where its heading. the
> /Apache thing was being developed just a short time before I learned of
> REBOL but I have seen many a post about it. I think that if you look at the
> propositions about all the other products its clear that /Apache is on the
> backburner and to me I would be surprised if its still in work at all. I
> really don't think its necessary given the resources and outlook of RT.
> Correct me if I'm wrong.
I have no info like that. MS based webserver is a piggy business, sorry. There
is still tens of percent of Apache marketshare. Or you suggest me, that as a
hobbyist or mid-business, I should set-up Win based machine, where I have to pay
for each bit of functionality? How much does server Win2K cost? How much is
MSSQL for?
I have one red-hat server installed, and also have serveral friends running both
Unix and Win based servers. The beauty of Unix based solutions is - you don't
generally need to boot your server for many many months :-)
I mentioned Rebol/Apache because it was concrete product - it was already done.
So I thought it would requeire just some kind of recompile or not so much of a
work ....
I know author of Apache doesn't work with Apache dev. team, but I have currently
no info indicating /Apache is gonna be discarded/non-further-developed. Hmm -
even IBM offers now Linux based servers, even Linux based mainframes .... I am
not sure of Apache dead-end ...
Cheers,
-pekr-
>
>
> Paul Tretter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Petr Krenzelok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:11 PM
> Subject: [REBOL] Rebol/Apache?
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > if you will look at RT's product website, you will notice there is no
> > mention of Link/World, and they are mentioning Rebol/View and
> > Rebol/View/Pro there instead.
> >
> > However, I would like to enter Apache territory once again. So the
> > question for Jeff and Dan:
> >
> > Jeff - would it be too much of work to rebuild Rebol/Apache, based upon
> > Rebol/Core 2.5?
> >
> > Dan - would you consider /Apache release based upon Core/Pro?
> >
> > The question is, if addition of shell and library interfaces to Apache
> > wouldn't be considered as a break of security. Then maybe both
> > components could be allowed at least during the boot-load time ....
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -pekr-
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> > subject, without the quotes.
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> subject, without the quotes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
