Brett:

Sorry for this: I had to put the details in my request in order to make it
more clear ;-(

Basically, on each test station a local REBOL page server respond to
requests emitted by html page and generate and send new html pages. 

Those generated html pages are used as the GUI, and are composed of
DHTML-Java-Javascript. Their generation is based on html templates in which
data are inserted. Those data are contained in a - primitive but functional
- REBOL OODB. Examples of data are a question and the possible multiple
choice answers to it, or the presence and layout of a time slider ...

When a test session has been executed, all tests are corrected by a REBOL
app, reports are generated using also DHTML-Java-Javascript pages templates
and the answers and results are inserted into a SQL Server DB for archive
and longitudinal studies use.

In terms of volume, based on what we can estimate until now, some 8000
persons/year should use the system, which should correspond to about
4,000,000 pages generated / year.

Do not hesitate to ask for more details, if you need it.

Thanks for answering !

Regards,

chr==


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Handley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: dinsdag 10 april 2001 10:09
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      [REBOL] Re: Need help for justification of using REBOL as
> dev language
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can you remind us of the structure of your solution?
> 
> For example, I seem to recall that you used HTML as a GUI - is this right?
> 
> Brett
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "REBOL List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:37 PM
> Subject: [REBOL] Need help for justification of using REBOL as dev
> language
> 
> 
> > Hi list:
> >
> > As already mentioned on this list, the whole psychotechnical assessment
> > system of the Belgian Armed Forces is running REBOL...
> >
> > Well, I think personally it was the best choice I ever made as project
> > manager: REBOL is stable, ergonomical, easy to learn and use, has lot of
> > possibilities for being used to access ODBC and external libs, ... and I
> > feel good when I use it !
> >
> > But the choice of REBOL was a personal choice, not an Armed Forces
> standard:
> > it was in first instances justified by the fact the project had to be
> > operational in less than a few month... So I had no time for
> prospection.
> >
> > Now the project is going further and the code is getting stable, I feel
> the
> > time is coming some high-ranked folks will ask me to justify my choices,
> and
> > try to impose some standards like Java of PowerBuilder ;-(
> >
> > Well here is my request: there are lots of people - and gurus - on this
> > list, who are coming from different developing universes - like C, Lisp,
> > Java ... - and have discover the power of REBOL ... Please help me find
> > straight and technical args I could use to justify the use of REBOL.
> Even
> > language comparison tables should be useful !
> >
> > Perhaps we could create together a new standard for the Belgian Armed
> Forces
> > ;-))
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > chr==
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
> > subject, without the quotes.
> >
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
> subject, without the quotes.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to