[REBOL] Re: Need help for justification of using REBOL as dev language

[CRS - Psy Sel/SPO, COUSSEMENT Christophe, CPN]

Hi list:

I'm very grateful to all for the arguments provided as answer to my request.

It will help me a lot !!!

I particularly liked the analysis of Ryan and Brett. I have found many args
in the J. K. Ousterhout's article too:

http://dev.scriptics.com/people/john.ousterhout/scripting.html

About this article: a very interesting comparison is given by the figure 1 -
level/typing -
Has anybody any idea where to situate REBOL on the graph ? I assume it
should be similar to Tcl/Perl ?
Perhaps there are any folk at RT who could tell me what the range of
instructions/statement for REBOL is ?

Great too are the code comparison Tcl - Java - C++ . This example is easy to
translate in REBOL and provides some difficult to refute arg about the
compacity of REBOL.

I just don't fully agree with the author's thought about OO programming, but
that's not the point right here  - perhaps another time ...

Well I'll get to work and write my justification now :-( ... when duty calls
...

Thanks again to all for the great job !!!

CU,

chr==



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.