--- James Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Problems exist when you want agents to be able to > interact with each other > and their environment - it is the interaction itself > that can be a security > risk as stated earlier, hence the need for some > level of shell which is not > directly linked to the rebol language.
I'm not sure why REBOL, as a language, is inadequate to this. Shouldn't the usual security features of REBOL, combined with having the agents *not* running in the same process as the "place" code, be able to provide adequate security? What is missing that you would gain through any other arrangement? Chris Dicely __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
