> Once you unset UNPROTECT, you can use it as a security feature. :)

I agree.

> (Other possibilities are: saving and restoring system/words;
> running the untrusted code in a copy of system/words)

I think that also protecting system/words is not secure, because a program can
change a field in an object, like
system/user/... without changing global words. You can not save all the system
with a copy deep.

> About tourists, I think an implementation could even just use a
> dialect.

A dialect or launch with IPC should be better choices.

---
Ciao
Romano


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to