> But the goal is to not keep making the example shown with the C, MatLab,
and
> Pearl smaller, but to make a more verbose accurate portrayal of the
original
> puzzle in Rebol.
Here is a very verbose version of my original solution with Sunanda's
explanation idea incorporated:
REBOL []
box: [Box1 Box2 Box3]
wins: 0
loop number-of-games: 100 [
pick-a: func [what] [copy/part random what 1]
prize: pick-a box
choice1: pick-a box
remaining-box: exclude box opened-box: exclude box union prize
choice1
choice2: pick-a remaining-box
if win: equal? prize choice2 [
wins: wins + 1
]
print join "I choose " [
choice1 ". " opened-box " opened. I switch to "
choice2 ". Prize in " prize ". I "
either win ["win"]["lose"] "."
]
]
print wins / number-of-games
> I'm then going to go see if they can do the same in Pearl, or language of
> choice.
The choice of variable name is going to impact on the goal of the smallest
verbose program.
For this goal I believe one should use a meaningful name - something that
does not require a legend to understand it
immediately in it's own context.
Brett.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
