Having been to a live session with Roger Sessions it is my opinion that you have to take his opinions with a grain (or two) of salt. Between his half baked assumptions and unsubstantiated declarations I find some of his conclusions unsupported.
I mean how does he come up with the conclusion that J2EE can't be run on commodity hardware? So what's so complex about SOAP?? It's merely an envelope of XML written in XML. Am I missing something here? Michael -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christian Langreiter Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 6:45 PM To: Graham Chiu Subject: [REBOL] Re: Google + SOAP To quote Roger Sessions: "SOAP [is] a rather confusing acronym, since it is neither simple, nor related to objects!" http://www.objectwatch.com/FinalJ2EEandDotNet.doc Indeed, simple it is not. REBOL is. But there has not been an answer on my high-performance server quetsion yet - I just don't hope because there isn't any ;-) -- Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
