> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Volker Nitsch > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: RFC: make-doc-pro feature / glossary
> for glossary: if you mark only for html, that would be visible only there. Hi, that's just the idea for HTML output. For PDF output it would be possible to include an implicit chapter "glossary". > the benefit of make-doc dialect is, it is readble as text too. That's what it should be :-)) > dialect?: something special nearly the same as the usual. > text?: you can't use smart hovering.. > html?: text which knows there is a mouse. > make-doc?: a quick way to write good looking. > > for general words there is an include-option. So is this just the definition of the glossary words or do you want to include this into normal text? Will all words in the text show the glossary term? How about: \glossary :dialect - something special nearly the same as usual. =include general_words.r /glossary Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
