On 09-Sep-02, Kemp Watson wrote:
> Certainly that's a starting point; however, the Rebol header block
> is extensible, not mandatory, and not really typed in any way. My
> first thought is a func in a well-known .r file that mandates
> certain metadata that would be understood by the engine, and that
> would send it to the engine and publish it.
> K.
keywords for starters, perhaps?
REBOL [
keywords: ["this" "that" "the other"]
]
One advantage of keywords is it doesn't need a lot of thought to think
up a few words related to your script. This means people are more
likely to bother to add them. Certainly easier than writing a
description of your script...
>> Hi Kemp,
>>> you would like to work together to define a 'standard' for Rebol
>>> metadata.
>> I thought the REBOL Header was standard meta-data...
>> - Chris
--
Carl Read
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
