> XFML looks to be quite interesting - based on RDF, which has the potential > to tie it to the Semantic Web. There's been some criticism however that 1) > RDF is less rich than RSS, and that the Semantic Web is doomed to failute if > it uses RDF, and 2) that topic maps don't use the full potential of RDF.
I don't quite follow that last sentence. Probably bacause my grasp is still slim on the most of these XML meta-kits. Can you elaborate please Here's some brief comments about XfmlAndOtherTechnologies http://xfml.net/index.php?page=XfmlAndOtherTechnologies > I dunno, gotta read more. me too.. Peter Van Dijk has set up a mailing list for XFML. A good place to put any of your questions, since there is small but appreciative audience who are really in to this stuff. His site and blog are worth visiting: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/ [yesteday's account of his MS interview] http://petervandijck.net/ > I WILL play with this stuff in REBOL. > > K. Great to hear that:-) My impression is that XFML might be very well suited to a REBOL implementation and vice versa ./Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
