Thankyou all for your thoughts so far re Rebol on Mac OS X it was gratifying to read such a broad and enthusiastic response.
Although it appears to me that Rebol for OS X is definitely coming from RT [some time], I believe that our voices in unison can only help maintain the urgency and our spot in what has to be a very long development list. [If I only had the money.....] Rods comment... > Some work was also done on View on OS X (betas I think) - enough for RT to > say they had some issues, including performance, that needed to be addressed > before it was an acceptable port. was interesting, I personally would be more than happy to run a slooooow flaky /View beta rather than the nothing available at the moment. [Anecdotal evidence from this list suggests that Rebol Beta's are often better than some other peoples released code!] Just a thought, but.... Maybe RT could make /View beta for Mac OS X available on a personal request basis? [As in registering to be come a beta tester?] Finally: Joel thanks for some interesting links :) > http://www.byte.com/documents/s=7620/byt1032475416823/0923_bar.html > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/26/0058238&mode=thread&tid=107 > http://www.apple.com/uk/hotnews/articles/simoncozens/ > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/22/1922205&mode=thread&tid=106 and *Special* thanks to Carl :) for the one liner, that gets my rebol /Core back happening, on OS X 10.2 > Add the following line to your login script: > setenv DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES /usr/lib/libtermcap.dylib > and, REBOL will run again. [Thanks Ron.] -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
