On 30-Sep-02, Romano Paolo Tenca wrote: > Hi, Carl, >>>>> That reverse will not fail on different system? >>>>> (big-endian/little endian)
>>> Another good point. I'm using Win NT 4.0 on Intel. What happens >>> on other >>> systems? >>> No one with Rebol running on Amiga? >> Thought I could safely avoid this thread, but it seems not. (; On a >> 32Meg Amiga... >>>> r: make bitset! 1024 * 1024 * 768 > Thanks Carl, but we want to know if the reverse fails on a different > system. This is the test and the result on Intel: > enbase/base head reverse load skip form insert make bitset! 16 15 13 > 2 == "1000000000000000" > We fear that on amiga it will be "0000000010000000" Ah. I looked back too far into the mails. (: No, it behaves as on Intel... >> enbase/base head reverse load skip form insert make bitset! 16 15 13 2 == "1000000000000000" Is this consistantly good or consistantly bad? (; -- Carl Read -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
