>>     set [foo bar baz] copy []
>>
E> You will find that only foo is set set to a block, whereas bar and baz 
E> are initialized to the value none. This is unlike using
E> set [foo bar baz[] 3 ;- (i.e. some non-series value
E> where all words will be initialized to the same value.

Excellent point Elan! And a great example of how what we *think* is
just a different idiom might actually behave differently.

-- Gregg                         

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to